On the money

By Mark Toren | April 20, 2026 | Last updated on April 21, 2026
4 min read
On the money
iStockphoto

Wealth advisors evaluate firms a bit like they judge securities. Before they’ll consider joining, they’re looking for a strong narrative, investment philosophy, established management team, healthy capital reserves, strong value-added proposition and a powerful compensation package. Each is critically important in their decision to partner with an organization. Pay though, is at or near the top of the list among virtually all advisors.

Start-ups with growth capital deficiencies and an unwillingness to part with equity are a big red flag. At established firms, antiquated compensation structures are also perceived poorly.

A lot has changed in the last 15 years. On the bank counsel side, we have seen the gradual, systemic shift from base-plus-bonus to a complete variable-based mode, with a draw-based structure.

With independent investment counsel firms, there are few common industry models. Advisors are offered a countless array of variations.

At the bank-based private counsel firms, the pay models are similar but the percentages will differ, within a 5–10% range.

Relative to most independent dealers, bank-based compensation structures offer lower grid payouts because bank infrastructures together with public shareholder pressures demand strong margins. There is no room for negotiation.

Independent firms all offer various models. With some firms, wealth advisors may have varying pay structures: however, there is somewhat more flexibility in negotiation.

Firms large and small are all tripping over themselves to compete for the same advisor pool. Inadequate compensation models make it difficult to retain and motivate existing employees and attract new ones.

There are many reasons that firms have had to get more creative in compensation design. We’ve seen a persistent shortage in the number of wealth advisors — women particularly.

So, what do compensation best practices in Canada really look like in 2026?

Bank brokerage advisors

Advisors are paid on a commission-only formula based on a production grid. They receive anywhere between 40–50% of production. Support, restricted share units (RSU) and other perks are determined by production levels.

Those at the director or higher level receive additional compensation above 50% paid in RSUs, up to a maximum of 56%. They normally have a three-year vesting period. Numerous perks can be provided once a book of business has reached $2 million in revenue.

Independent broker dealers

Advisors can choose a percentage payout on the corporate model (often about 50%) or a 70–85% payout on the independent agent model.

Leading independent dealers offer both corporate and independent agent models for advisors. This gives the advisor flexibility over how they wish to run their business. Not all independent firms offer these options.

With the independent agent model, the advisor is responsible for their own expenses and deductions. They are running their own profit-and-loss ledger. They are also allowed to incorporate on the insurance side, if licensed.

Bank private counsel

The economic model is based on pure variable compensation. The base portion is a draw against their overall revenues. Overall commissions can range anywhere between 12–27% of revenues depending on firm.

All the banks operate the same formula: variations of the same economic model.

Like the bank brokerages, associate support services are provided by the firm and is a firm expense. The firm picks up the entire expense, rather than a finite fixed amount.

For independent private wealth managers, there is a wide range of compensation models. Many counsel firms offer a strong base component with bonuses based on a percentage of their base. Or else, the bonus can be discretionary, based on net assets raised and retention.

Other private counsel firms offer a base salary plus commissions or a commission-only structure.

Small independent firms will offer an equity component in lieu of up-front signing bonuses. To attract and retain strong portfolio managers, small boutiques offer equity partnership as part of the offering. This can be meaningful if the firm is paying annual dividends.

For portfolio managers, the liquidity value remains the most compelling reason to join a private firm. This is common among Canadian private wealth firms.

Bonuses

Signing bonuses play a key part in advisor transitions.

With bank brokerages, the typical transition package runs about 1.5-times revenues. This tends to be firm with limited negotiation.

Independent brokerages offer more attractive multiples and buy-outs.

Not only are the multiples higher for standard advisor transitions, independents offer more competitive buy-outs for retiring advisors. An increasing number of bank advisors are gravitating to independent dealers, in part so that they can accept a buy-out down the road.

In general, boutique private wealth firms do not pay a significant signing bonus. They simply have insufficient capital to do so. They may offer a transition payment for a one- to two-year period.

That can be attractive — equity pay-outs or annual dividend payments are appealing. But joining an independent is only meaningful if the firm can show strong, realistic growth projections.

Puzzle pieces

For many advisors, a strong compensation plan with an inadequate structure, investment style, product-service offering, individual flexibility and corporate culture will be of marginal interest. Getting the formula right means getting all the pieces of the puzzle to fit.

Successful advisors — those who deliver a stable, strong annual growth rate — have extraordinary leverage in the war for talent. Compensation is a key reason for joining and leaving a firm.

This article has been updated.


Subscribe to our newsletters

Mark Toren

Mark Toren

Mark Toren is president & CEO of Toren & Associates. He’s at mark@torenassociates.com.